Tech for Change
Are you considering a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV)? You’re not alone. PHEVs offer a unique blend of electric driving and gasoline backup, appealing to many drivers looking to dip their toes into electrification without fully committing to an all-electric car. The Jeep Wrangler 4xe, a plug-in hybrid version of the iconic off-roader, became a surprising bestseller, topping the PHEV charts in the U.S. This highlights a key motivator for many Americans: financial incentives. The author of the original article candidly admits that the federal EV tax credit significantly influenced their decision to purchase the Wrangler 4xe.
Promotional image for Tech For Change. Person standing on solar panel looking at sunset.
But beyond tax credits and popularity, what truly makes a plug-in hybrid car “the best”? After driving a Jeep Wrangler 4xe for over 6,000 miles, the author shares their experiences, revealing the realities of PHEV ownership, from unexpected benefits to the often-frustrating state of public EV charging, and ultimately, whether a PHEV is the right stepping stone to a fully electric future.
PHEVs: Not a One-Size-Fits-All Solution
It’s crucial to understand that not all plug-in hybrids are created equal. The term “plug-in hybrid” itself doesn’t guarantee exceptional electric range or impressive fuel economy. The Jeep Wrangler 4xe serves as a prime example. Its design prioritizes off-road capability and ruggedness over aerodynamic efficiency. Driving a heavy, boxy vehicle like the Wrangler, even with a 17kWh battery, will inevitably result in a limited all-electric range.
The author’s experience confirms this: a full charge in the Wrangler 4xe yields just over 20 miles of electric driving range in city conditions. The combined fuel efficiency over 6,000 miles averaged a modest 23 mpg. While this is arguably better than the gas-only Wrangler models, the improvement isn’t dramatic.
However, despite these limitations, the PHEV powertrain does offer tangible advantages. For short trips around urban areas, electric-only driving provides a quieter and more serene experience, a welcome contrast to the Wrangler’s typically noisy gas engine. Even with the gasoline engine engaged, the hybrid system optimizes efficiency by frequently shutting off the engine during coasting and at stops, similar to an advanced start/stop system.
Moreover, the electric motor significantly boosts the Wrangler 4xe’s power output, delivering 375 horsepower and 470 lb.-ft of torque. This added power is especially noticeable when accelerating, tackling inclines, and merging onto highways – a valuable asset in a vehicle of this size and weight. Crucially, the electric motor’s power remains available even when the battery indicator shows zero miles of electric range, ensuring consistent performance.
The core value of a PHEV powertrain isn’t solely about maximizing fuel efficiency; it’s about offering a blend of electric capability and gasoline engine flexibility.
Jeep’s continued investment in PHEV technology, evidenced by the introduction of more Wrangler 4xe trims and the Grand Cherokee 4xe, signals their commitment to this powertrain approach. While critics might point out that PHEVs with smaller batteries and moderate fuel economy are not a complete solution for transitioning away from fossil fuels, they undeniably play a role in familiarizing the public with the concept of plugging in vehicles – a significant step, particularly for drivers traditionally drawn to gasoline-powered SUVs like Jeeps.
The Unexpected Perk: Prime Parking Spots
Beyond the technical aspects, a surprising benefit of PHEV ownership emerges: preferential parking. While the limited electric range of the Wrangler 4xe might not always justify seeking out charging stations for the sake of charging alone, the availability of premium parking spots reserved for EVs and PHEVs becomes a compelling incentive.
Alt text: Jeep Wrangler 4xe utilizes a prime parking spot at an EV charging station.
Airports often feature EV charging spots conveniently located near terminal entrances. Retailers like Ikea offer closer parking for electric vehicles. Ski resorts frequently designate prime parking areas for EVs, often without additional fees. Even in dense urban environments like New York City, curbside EV chargers can improve the chances of finding coveted street parking.
The convenience of superior parking often outweighs the immediate need for charging.
While acknowledging the potential for “parking envy” from drivers of fully electric vehicles who genuinely require charging, the author adopts a pragmatic “first come, first served” approach. As a PHEV owner with a charging plug, they argue for equal entitlement to these designated spots, particularly in areas where gasoline cars frequently obstruct EV chargers.
The Harsh Reality: Public EV Charging Infrastructure
Despite the growing number of EV chargers in urban areas, significant challenges persist in the public EV charging landscape. Reports of broken, non-operational, blocked, and overcrowded chargers remain widespread. The lack of a unified system for locating available and functional chargers adds to the frustration. Furthermore, the diverse payment systems – per hour, per kWh, or hybrid models – and inconsistent pricing structures can sometimes make public charging more expensive than refueling with gasoline.
Alt text: Public EV charging station in New York City, highlighting urban charging infrastructure.
New York City, despite its density and environmental concerns, exemplifies the shortcomings of current EV charging infrastructure. The city’s investment in public charging stations is disproportionately low compared to its population and the number of gasoline stations. Private garages often impose substantial monthly fees for EV charging, with limited charger availability.
The scarcity of public EV charging options, especially fast charging, is a major deterrent to EV adoption, particularly in densely populated cities.
The author highlights the stark reality: a city of 9 million people has a mere 41 public EV charging stations, with a minuscule number of DC fast-charging options. This stark contrast with the abundance of gasoline stations in Manhattan alone underscores the significant infrastructure gap. This charging infrastructure deficit is a primary reason for the author’s current hesitation towards fully embracing electric vehicles.
PHEV as a Bridge, Not a Final Destination (For Now)
For the author, owning a PHEV has served as an eye-opening experience, solidifying their decision to postpone a full EV purchase for the foreseeable future. While initially drawn to the idea of an EV, experiencing the realities of PHEV ownership, particularly the charging challenges, has tempered their enthusiasm for going all-electric – at least in the current environment, especially in a city like New York and with their driving patterns.
The author’s driving habits involve either short urban trips or long journeys outside the city. While modern EVs theoretically possess sufficient range for 200-250 mile trips, the charging infrastructure along these routes remains a significant hurdle. Finding reliable and readily available Level 3 or DC fast chargers outside of major urban centers is often a challenge. Even with the expanding Tesla Supercharger network opening to other EVs, the charging infrastructure problem is far from solved.
The uncertainty of finding readily available and functional charging, coupled with potentially time-consuming and costly charging processes, introduces “charging anxiety” – a significant deterrent for long-distance travel in an EV. For someone accustomed to the convenience of gasoline refueling, the current EV charging landscape presents a considerable inconvenience.
PHEVs offer a valuable transitional step, revealing both the advantages and limitations of electric vehicle technology without the full commitment and charging dependence of a pure EV.
The author concludes that another PHEV remains the preferred choice for their next vehicle. They value the electric driving capability, the added performance, and the absence of range or charging anxiety. With PHEV technology continuously improving, offering increasing electric ranges, the author expresses greater confidence in the future of PHEVs than in the rapid development of a robust and convenient public EV charging infrastructure in the near term. This perspective, while perhaps disappointing for EV advocates, reflects the current realities and practical considerations for many drivers.
