The 2010 Infiniti Fx50 Car is a powerful and feature-packed SUV that aims to compete with European luxury giants like the Porsche Cayenne and BMW X6. Boasting a robust 390-horsepower V8 engine and striking 21-inch wheels, the FX50 makes a bold statement. However, beneath the surface, does this Infiniti truly measure up to its premium price tag and rivals? Let’s dive into a comprehensive review of the FX50 to see where it shines and where it falls short.
Essentially unchanged from the 2009 model, the 2010 FX50 offers a carryover of its powerful engine and distinctive design. The most notable update is the inclusion of a Bluetooth-capable DVD entertainment system, a minor tweak in an otherwise familiar package. While the FX50 presents itself as a compelling option in the luxury SUV market, its price point places it in direct competition with established marques, raising questions about its overall value proposition beyond just specifications and features.
One of the most polarizing aspects of the Infiniti FX50 car is its styling. Infiniti took a bold and unique approach with the FX series, characterized by fluid curves and a distinctive silhouette. This design language is undeniably divisive; you’ll find enthusiasts who are captivated by its unique look, while others may find it less appealing. Whether you love it or hate it, the FX50’s design is certainly a defining characteristic.
Staff Opinions on the FX50 Car
Tim Suddard, Publisher Emeritus
Tim Suddard, a seasoned automotive expert, delivers a particularly critical perspective on the FX50 car. He expresses strong reservations, even suggesting that vehicles like the FX50 might contribute to road rage among SUV drivers. Suddard points to several key issues, starting with the high price tag of $65,000 for what he perceives as a vehicle with compromised practicality. He cites cramped seating for its class, excessive road noise intruding into the cabin, and an engine he deems needlessly overpowered for daily driving.
Further criticisms include the FX50’s handling, which Suddard describes as exhibiting tramlining on the highway due to the oversized 21-inch wheels and tires. Ride quality is another significant drawback, likened to a “63 4×4 Ford pickup,” indicating a harsh and uncomfortable experience. Even minor ergonomic details come under fire, such as cupholders that fail to securely hold standard coffee mugs. Suddard also highlights a frustratingly complex radio and a technology package that he found intrusive and difficult to manage, contributing to a negative overall driving experience. In conclusion, Suddard ranks the FX50 among the “worst vehicles we have had,” citing poor fuel economy and unappealing aesthetics as additional negatives. He suggests considering alternatives like a Honda Ridgeline and Ford Flex for better value and practicality.
Tom Heath, UberDork
Tom Heath offers a somewhat less তীব্র critique but still finds the FX50 car lacking. While he doesn’t find the ride quality as objectionable as Suddard, Heath struggles to identify any area where the FX50 truly excels, especially when considering its shared platform with the Infiniti G37. He questions the FX50’s purpose and value, stating that he could “think of dozens of others” he would choose in the $50,000-plus SUV price range. Heath also echoes the sentiment regarding the FX50’s styling, referring to it with a less-than-flattering “rolling uterus” descriptor, further emphasizing the divisive nature of its design. Ultimately, Heath’s review suggests that for the price, there are more compelling options available in the luxury SUV segment, perhaps even hinting at the Grand Cherokee SRT-8 as a more appealing alternative.
Conclusion: FX50 Car – Style Over Substance?
The 2010 Infiniti FX50 car presents a mixed bag. It offers undeniable power and a unique, albeit controversial, design. However, the reviews highlight significant drawbacks concerning ride comfort, ergonomics, and overall value when placed against competitors in the luxury SUV market. While the FX50 may appeal to those seeking a powerful and visually distinctive SUV, potential buyers should carefully weigh its shortcomings against its price and consider whether alternatives might offer a more well-rounded and satisfying ownership experience.
