When Mazda unveiled the CX-50, many speculated about the fate of the ever-popular CX-5. Would it be phased out, or would both models coexist? Historically, Mazda has employed both strategies – replacing models like the CX-9 with the CX-90, while keeping older models like the CX-3 as budget options alongside newer counterparts like the CX-30. However, Mazda has taken a different approach this time, positioning the CX-5 as the more budget-conscious choice while the CX-50 emerges as its slightly more premium, de facto successor, boasting that coveted “new car smell.” For car buyers in the compact SUV market considering a Mazda, the question isn’t necessarily about replacement, but rather understanding the nuanced differences between the Mazda CX-5 vs CX-50 to make the best decision.
Size and Dimensions: Do You Need More Space?
Both the Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 compete fiercely in the compact SUV segment. However, within this class, size variations are significant. The CX-5, measuring 180 inches in length, leans towards the “compact” end of the spectrum. It’s noticeably shorter than rivals like the Honda CR-V and Volkswagen Tiguan, each exceeding the Mazda by approximately half a foot. While inches might seem negligible, this difference translates to tangible rear legroom disparities. Taller passengers in the CX-5’s rear seats might find the space somewhat confined, especially when compared to the more spacious back rows of the Honda and VW.
Alt text: Rear passenger seats of the Mazda CX-5 showing legroom and seat design, highlighting compact SUV interior.
Acknowledging the demand for increased space, Mazda designed the CX-50 with larger dimensions. Extending 6 inches beyond the CX-5, the CX-50 not only offers enhanced passenger room, but also a more generous cargo area. While the Honda CR-V and Volkswagen Tiguan still maintain their lead in overall spaciousness, the CX-50 represents a significant step up from the CX-5, aiming to provide a more comfortable and accommodating environment for both passengers and cargo.
Alt text: Cargo area of the Mazda CX-50 SUV, showcasing the increased storage capacity compared to the CX-5, emphasizing practicality.
Performance and Engine Options: Power and Efficiency
In terms of powertrains, Mazda has maintained consistency between the CX-5 and CX-50, offering identical engine lineups for both models, at least initially. The standard engine for both is a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine delivering 187 horsepower and 185 lb-ft of torque. For drivers seeking a more spirited driving experience, a turbocharged version of this engine is available. This turbocharged variant produces an impressive 227 hp and 310 lb-ft of torque when using regular gasoline, and even greater figures – 256 hp and 320 lb-ft of torque – when fueled with 93 octane premium gasoline. Equipped with the latter, both the CX-5 and CX-50 achieve acceleration figures that place them among the quickest non-luxury compact SUVs currently available on the market, offering engaging performance for driving enthusiasts.
However, the Mazda CX-50 distinguishes itself with a significant future powertrain advantage. Beginning with the 2025 model year, the CX-50 will introduce a Toyota-sourced hybrid powertrain option. This hybrid system combines a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine with three electric motors, resulting in a combined output of 219 horsepower and 163 lb-ft of torque. The key benefit of this hybrid system is enhanced fuel efficiency, with an EPA combined cycle rating of 38 mpg. This represents a substantial improvement compared to both the standard engine (28 mpg combined) and the turbocharged engine (25 mpg combined) offered in both models. Notably, this fuel-efficient hybrid option is not available for the CX-5, giving the CX-50 a distinct edge for environmentally conscious buyers and those prioritizing fuel economy.
Conclusion: Choosing Between CX-5 and CX-50
Deciding between the Mazda CX-5 vs CX-50 ultimately depends on individual priorities. The CX-5 remains a compelling choice for buyers seeking a budget-friendly, yet still well-equipped and enjoyable compact SUV. It excels in providing Mazda’s signature driving dynamics and premium feel at a more accessible price point. The CX-50, while sharing many similarities, caters to those who prioritize increased space, a slightly more rugged aesthetic, and, crucially, the option of a fuel-efficient hybrid powertrain in the near future. While both are excellent vehicles, the CX-50 is positioned as the slightly more upscale and forward-looking option, justifying its role as the de facto successor in Mazda’s evolving SUV lineup.
