When the Mazda CX-50 was first introduced, many anticipated it would either fully replace the CX-5 or coexist for a short period before the CX-5 was phased out. Historically, Mazda has employed both strategies, such as with the CX-9 transitioning to the CX-90, and the CX-3 remaining as a budget option alongside the newer CX-30. However, Mazda has opted to maintain the CX-5 with a wide range of trim levels, positioning it as a more affordable alternative while the CX-50 essentially steps in as its modern successor.
Size and Dimensions: Space Comparison
Both the Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 compete within the crowded compact SUV segment, yet size variations exist even within this vehicle class. The CX-5 leans towards the more compact end; its length of 180 inches makes it approximately half a foot shorter than models like the Honda CR-V and Volkswagen Tiguan. While this difference might seem minor, it translates to less rear legroom, potentially making the CX-5’s back seats feel cramped for taller occupants. In contrast, the Honda and VW offer significantly more spacious rear seating.
Alt text: Side-by-side comparison of Mazda CX-5 and a Honda CR-V highlighting the difference in vehicle length, emphasizing the compact dimensions of the CX-5.
Addressing the need for increased space, Mazda designed the CX-50 to be larger. It extends 6 inches longer than the CX-5, resulting in not only enhanced passenger room but also a slightly larger cargo area. Although the CR-V and Tiguan still provide considerably more room in both passenger and cargo capacity, the CX-50 aims to offer a more comfortable and spacious environment compared to the CX-5.
Alt text: Image showcasing the cargo space of a Mazda CX-50, emphasizing its larger storage capacity compared to the CX-5, suitable for luggage and gear.
Performance and Engine Options
Mazda has carried over the CX-5’s powertrain options to the CX-50 without modifications. Both models come standard with a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine producing 187 horsepower and 185 lb-ft of torque. For those seeking more spirited performance, a turbocharged version is available, delivering 227 hp and 310 lb-ft of torque on regular gasoline, and an even more robust 256 hp and 320 lb-ft on 93 octane fuel. With the turbocharged engine, both the CX-5 and CX-50 rank among the quicker non-luxury compact SUVs available.
Alt text: Close-up view of the Mazda CX-5 engine, showcasing the 2.5-liter four-cylinder powertrain, highlighting the standard engine option shared with the CX-50.
However, the CX-50 gains a unique advantage with the introduction of a Toyota-sourced hybrid powertrain starting from the 2025 model year. This hybrid system combines a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine with three electric motors, achieving a combined output of 219 hp and 163 lb-ft of torque. The CX-50 Hybrid boasts a significantly improved fuel efficiency rating of 38 mpg in combined EPA cycle, surpassing both the standard engine (28 mpg combined) and the turbo engine (25 mpg combined). The hybrid powertrain is not offered for the CX-5, making it a key differentiator.
Alt text: Image of the Mazda CX-50 Hybrid badge, indicating the availability of a fuel-efficient hybrid powertrain option, a feature not available in the CX-5.
